BlogR&D Tax Incentive for Software Companies in Australia: What Actually Qualifies?

Many software founders assume the Australian R&D Tax Incentive applies only to laboratories, manufacturing, or scientific research.

In reality, software companies are among the most frequent participants in the program.

The determining factor is not whether you write code. It is whether your development involves genuine technical uncertainty that requires structured experimentation.

This guide explains how the R&D Tax Incentive for software companies in Australia works, what qualifies, and how to approach documentation properly.

Can Software Development Qualify for the R&D Tax Incentive in Australia?

Yes. Software development can qualify for the R&D Tax Incentive when it involves resolving technical uncertainty through systematic experimentation.

Routine coding does not qualify.

Activities may qualify when they:

  • Attempt to resolve technical uncertainty
  • Compare alternative technical approaches
  • Generate new knowledge within the company
  • Follow an iterative, hypothesis-driven process
  • Have outcomes that cannot be determined in advance

The Australian Government defines eligible R&D activities as those conducted for the purpose of generating new knowledge, where the outcome cannot be known beforehand based on current industry knowledge.

For official guidance, refer to:

What Is “Technical Uncertainty” in Software Development?

Technical uncertainty exists when a competent software professional cannot determine the solution using publicly available knowledge and must conduct experiments to resolve the issue.

Examples in software include:

  • Determining which system architecture will scale under high load
  • Benchmarking alternative database structures
  • Comparing AI model outputs for reliability and consistency
  • Designing novel algorithms
  • Resolving data reconciliation inconsistencies
  • Developing new performance optimisation techniques

If the answer is obvious or documented in standard practice, it is unlikely to qualify.

If experimentation is required to discover the answer, it may fall within the R&D framework.

Where R&D Typically Appears in Software Companies

In practical terms, software delivery usually unfolds across two streams:

1. Experimental Development (Potentially Eligible R&D)

  • Prototyping new solutions
  • Testing alternative architectures
  • AI model experimentation
  • Performance benchmarking
  • Structured comparison of approaches
  • Iterative validation of uncertain outcomes

2. Routine Development (Generally Not Eligible)

  • UI implementation
  • Standard API integration
  • Deployment workflows
  • Feature expansion using known techniques
  • Bug fixes

Understanding the difference between these streams is essential when claiming the R&D Tax Incentive for software development.

Quick Eligibility Checklist for Software Companies

Your software project may qualify for the R&D Tax Incentive in Australia if:

☐ The development work is conducted in Australia
☐ Your company is a registered entity (not a sole trader or partnership)
☐ Your company owns the resulting IP
☐ You are resolving genuine technical uncertainty
☐ You are conducting structured experimentation
☐ Outcomes were not known in advance
☐ You spend at least $20,000 on eligible R&D activities

If several of these apply, a detailed review is worthwhile.

What Software Expenses Can Be Claimed?

Eligible expenses may include:

  • Software development salaries tied to R&D activities
  • Contractor costs related to experimental work
  • Prototyping and testing costs
  • Depreciation of assets used in R&D
  • Certain overhead allocations

Generally ineligible expenses include:

  • Market research
  • Routine administrative software
  • Legal and compliance activities
  • Standard internal IT upgrades
  • Management studies

Eligibility depends on whether the expense directly relates to experimental R&D activity.

How Much Can Software Companies Claim?

For companies with aggregated turnover under $20 million:

  • A refundable tax offset may apply if the company is operating at a loss
  • A lower offset applies if the company is profitable

For companies over $20 million in turnover:

  • A non-refundable offset applies
  • The rate depends on R&D intensity

Current rates are published by the Australian Taxation Office.

Because tax structures can change, businesses should refer to the ATO website for the most up-to-date information.

Why Documentation Is Critical for Software R&D Claims

Strong delivery discipline naturally supports strong R&D evidence.

Companies should maintain:

  • Technical design documentation
  • Experiment records
  • Prototype comparisons
  • Performance benchmarks
  • Decision logs
  • Timesheets allocating staff to R&D tasks
  • Contracts and invoices for third-party services

Documentation should clearly show:

  • The technical objective
  • The uncertainty involved
  • The alternative approaches tested
  • The outcomes measured
  • The reasoning behind final decisions

Reconstructing experimentation after the fact is significantly more difficult than documenting it as it occurs.

Common Mistakes Software Companies Make

  1. Treating all development as eligible R&D
  2. Failing to distinguish experimentation from routine coding
  3. Not documenting uncertainty clearly
  4. Waiting until tax time to reconstruct evidence
  5. Underestimating how often genuine R&D occurs in product builds

Many companies miss eligibility because their processes are informal rather than structured.

Why Structure Matters Early

Software companies building AI products, scalable platforms, or technically complex systems frequently engage in eligible R&D activity.

When experimentation is intentional and documented from the beginning, both delivery outcomes and compliance outcomes improve.

Clarity around:

  • Objectives
  • Baselines
  • Experiment design
  • Technical decisions
  • Work allocation

strengthens both product development and R&D claims.

Planning a Technically Ambitious Software Initiative?

If you are building:

  • An AI-driven product
  • A scalable SaaS platform
  • A technically complex system
  • A new architectural approach
  • A solution involving uncertain performance outcomes

structuring experimentation properly from day one can materially reduce risk.

At Aerion, we help software companies approach delivery with clarity, discipline, and measurable experimentation through our DevReady process.

👉 Book a free DevReady consultation: https://aerion.com.au/contact/

FAQs

Can software development qualify for the R&D Tax Incentive in Australia?

Yes. Software development can qualify when it involves resolving technical uncertainty through structured experimentation and generating new knowledge. Routine coding and standard feature development generally do not qualify.

What is considered technical uncertainty in software R&D?

Technical uncertainty exists when a competent professional cannot determine the solution using existing knowledge and must conduct experiments to resolve the issue. Examples include scalability testing, AI benchmarking, and architectural comparisons.

Do AI projects qualify for the R&D Tax Incentive?

AI projects may qualify when they involve benchmarking different models, testing performance reliability, experimenting with configurations, or resolving unpredictable outputs. Standard implementation of existing AI tools typically does not qualify.

What documentation is required for a software R&D claim?

Documentation should include experiment records, technical design documents, benchmarks, decision logs, staff time allocations, contracts, and evidence that uncertainty existed and was resolved through structured experimentation.

What software activities are not eligible for the R&D Tax Incentive?

Generally ineligible activities include routine feature development, bug fixing, UI design, internal administration software, market research, and compliance-related tasks.

How much can software companies receive under the R&D Tax Incentive?

Companies under $20 million turnover may receive a refundable tax offset if operating at a loss. Larger companies receive a non-refundable offset based on R&D intensity. Current rates are available on the ATO website.

Does routine SaaS feature development qualify as R&D?

Routine feature development using established techniques generally does not qualify. Eligibility requires genuine technical uncertainty and experimentation.

©2025 Aerion Technologies. All rights reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy